In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-1115G4 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-1115G4
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 65% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 65% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2020
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-1115G4 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$530.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-1115G4 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-1115G4 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-1115G4
Sep 2nd, 2020
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
3733 MHz
67%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-1115G4 Sep 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 3733 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Xe-LP Graphics G4 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
