Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 879 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Core i3-10105F - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €16.73 vs €79.90
- Up to 80% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i3-10105F - €0.11 vs €0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €79.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €16.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |