Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €83.46 vs €163.40
- Up to 45% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-13100 - €0.48 vs €0.88 per FPS
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-10105F - 186 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
174
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.46
195%
Value Winner
Buy for €83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 277 minutes ago
Buy for €163.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |