Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K and the cheaper Core i3-10100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €96.79 vs €434.94
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700K - €0.48 vs €2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10100 - 206 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.79
449%
Value Winner
Buy for €96.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
23%
Price, €
€434.94
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €434.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |