Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €98.85 vs €222.60
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13600K - €0.65 vs €1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Core i3-10100 - 164 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€98.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €98.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1454 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
48%
Price, €
€222.6
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €222.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1728 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |