In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-1005G1 is slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-1005G1
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 24% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 months and 29 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Aug 01, 2019
- Is 8 months and 29 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-1005G1
Aug 1st, 2019
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
65%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-1005G1 Aug 1st, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 1st, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
