Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €72.54 vs €85.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.57 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G6900 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
127
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |