In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G3930 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 1700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6 – 70 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 month and 27 days newer – Mar 02, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 month and 27 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Ryzen 7 1700: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
61 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
88%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Ryzen 7 1700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700 Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
