The Celeron G3920 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G3920
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4670
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-4670 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3920
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
93%
Min 1% FPS
114
94%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€211.4
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-4670 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-4670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3920 vs Core i5-4670 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3920
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3920 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
51 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
