Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3222 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 53 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 40% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1820 - 213 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€367.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €367.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |