Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 80% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - 248 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€512.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €512.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |