Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 35% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1610T - 162 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |