Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €28.50 vs €471.07
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900K - €0.11 vs €1.63 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 289 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |