Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €88.28 vs €168.57
- Up to 42% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-12400 - €0.30 vs €0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1610 - 326 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
296
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7718 minutes ago
Buy for €168.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7718 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |