Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2987 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron B830 - 144 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €125.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B830 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |