Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3740 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 35 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 18% better in World of Tanks than Celeron B820 - 587 vs 499 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B820 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |