The Celeron 887 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-7700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-7700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 887 vs Core i7-7700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
88%
Min 1% FPS
110
89%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€234.07
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Celeron 887 vs Core i7-7700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 887 vs Core i7-7700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 887 vs Core i7-7700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 887 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
17 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
