In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3965U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 15 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6 – 91 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
91 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
3%
L3 Cache
2 MB
1%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | TRX4 |
15W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
