Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2440 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 52% better in New World than Celeron 3205U - 146 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 24 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€348.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €348.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |