Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2135 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 76% better in F1 23 than Celeron 2955U - 234 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 452 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 2955U | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |