Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3210 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 82% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron 1007U - 239 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 24 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€348.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €348.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1007U | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |