Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3210 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 45% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron 1007U - 126 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i5-12600K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1007U | vs | Core i5-12600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
