Buy on Amazon
€520
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $699
Availability
MSRP $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3537 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 35% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron 1000M - 298 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Amd Ryzen 9 7950X Processore, 16 Core/32 Thread Sfrenati, Architettura Zen 4, 80 Mb L3 Cache, Nero, 4 x 4 x 0.27 cm; 79.38 grammi
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
