The Celeron 1000M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-9400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-9400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-9400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Average FPS
164
88%
Min 1% FPS
111
90%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€119.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-9400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1000M vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1000M
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
22%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 1000M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 9 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
