Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 136 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Athlon 3000G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - €74.49 vs €237.62
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 3700X - €0.38 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 3000G - 208 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
198
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
Buy for €237.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Picasso | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |