Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 776 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Athlon 3000G
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €79.98 vs €168.57
- Up to 39% better value when playing New World than Core i5-12400 - €0.76 vs €1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 29% better in New World than Athlon 3000G - 135 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
105
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Buy for €168.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |