Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is 2738 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
- Performs up to 17% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 190 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2028
100%
Multi-Core
13045
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Chagall | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |