Buy on Amazon
€308.12
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
MSRP in USD: $5489
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 834 days newer than Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-8700T - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-8700T prcsr Tray Processori (fino a 4.00 GHz), 2.40 2400, 14 nm, 12 MB, 4.00 4000, DMI3, Coffee Lake)
Buy for €308.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1322
82.72841051314143%
Multi-Core
4691
31.636093876449962%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
