Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 1013 days newer than Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-8350K - 245 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 91 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1474
92.24030037546935%
Multi-Core
4238
28.581062854059887%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
