Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 1288 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than Celeron G3930 - 267 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.04755944931164%
Multi-Core
1043
7.03398974912328%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |