Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2821 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-8300 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |