Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 1111 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than EPYC 7551P - 424 vs 391 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD EPYC 7551P - 128 vs 64 threads
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 180 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | EPYC |
Castle Peak | Codename | Naples |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 32 |
128 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |