Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1190 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 418 vs 375 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
418
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€941.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €941.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
53.369880683650436%
Multi-Core
14579
69.42380952380952%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |