Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 555 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 3700U - 208 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
