Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €288.88 vs €1757.03
- Up to 84% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €1.42 vs €8.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.66/FPS
16%
Price, €
€1757.03
16%
Buy for €1,757.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |