Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 448 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i7-9700F - 280 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €422.66 vs €819.9
- Up to 48% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €1.52 vs €2.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.93/FPS
51.877133105802045%
Price, €
€819.9
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €819.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7511 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
278
99.28571428571429%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€422.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
92.42243436754177%
Multi-Core
6256
50.64356836396017%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |