Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1288 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 51% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930 - 240 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €50.95 vs €1757.03
- Up to 96% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €0.32 vs €7.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.32/FPS
4%
Price, €
€1757.03
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,757.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |