Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-10400 - 391 vs 350 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - €138.99 vs €4386.04
- Up to 96% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - €0.4 vs €11.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
FPS
391
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.22/FPS
3%
Price, €
€4386.04
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,386.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |