Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 723 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 11% better in League of Legends than Core i3-8300 - 168 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 62 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1301
83.50449293966624%
Multi-Core
3825
27.51006904487917%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 62 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
