Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 37 days newer than Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900X - 541 vs 539 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 165 vs 280 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Single-Core
1576
96.33251833740832%
Multi-Core
9371
66.89748715019988%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
