Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 781 days newer than Core i3-8100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8100 - 111 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
104
93.69369369369369%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€214.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €214.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
76.1002444987775%
Multi-Core
3405
24.30753854940034%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |