Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1077 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Celeron G3900 - 705 vs 678 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
678
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |