Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1453 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 255 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 85 vs 180 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Colfax | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 85 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
