Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1929 days newer than Core i7-3770.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3770 - 403 vs 380 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
380
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2325 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |