Buy on Amazon
€18.61
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1439 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 39% better in League of Legends than Core i3-4130 - 154 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i3-4130 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 54 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €18.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
84.97011101622545%
Multi-Core
1960
25.998142989786444%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
