Buy on Amazon
€9.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1197 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1840 - 215 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1840 2.80 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 3 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processore Socket LGA 1150
Buy for €9.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
