Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 435 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 183 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 28 vs 24 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
80.46607265250172%
Multi-Core
6976
64.98975218930502%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 14 |
| 24 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
