Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 809 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 133 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 127 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
65.95505617977528%
Multi-Core
6976
81.1540251279665%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
