Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 437 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
99.57374254049446%
Multi-Core
5794
86.14332441272673%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
