Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 189 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €258.88 vs €379.64
- Up to 37% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.37 vs €2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
175
92%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
63%
Price, €
€379.64
68%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |